Moral Superiority

Conflict dynamics are affected by the amount of social mobility in the system, the level and quality of communication between the parties, the scarcity of resources, the leadership styles in the parties, the amount of group solidarity, and the extent to which group members feel that their claims are legitimate. I also think that the way conflict is waged results to a great degree from the environment in which it ensues. Individuals and groups are more likely to engage in explicit conflict when they feel that there are not effective or legitimate alternatives for voicing their concerns and achieving justice. For example, paramilitaries may take up arms when groups feel that the government it biased or lacks the willingness or capacity to address their concerns.

Humans tend to be very willing to commit atrocious acts under the guises of justice, liberty and peace. I think this is because these are viewed as universal ideals that all humans are entitled to. Consequently, the pursuit of these goals is not only legitimized but carries significant moral weight and is difficult for outsiders to challenge without losing their own moral credibility. Therefore, the risk of punishment or resistance towards humans acting in the name of these ideals is greatly reduced, and it becomes not only safe but admirable for them to engage in these acts, which are seen as contributing to the common good, or as a temporary state of necessary and justified upheaval.